In doing so, I resolve to consider not only the more easily measurable aspects of quality discussed by David Garvin in his now classic November 1987 HBR article (performance, features, reliability, conformance, durability, serviceability) but also the more qualitative aspects covered in the Adams Good Products Bad Products book (perceived performance, performance/cost ratio, craftsmanship, consistency with human users and cultural values, aesthetic issues, sensitivity to finite resources and the environment, and finally emotional appeal. (Garvin did mention aesthetics and perceived quality in his article, which was entitled Competing on the Eight Dimensions of Quality, but brushed over them as being functions of individual judgment—Adams says hooray for individual judgment).
Finally I resolve to remain aware of the two cultures (the scientific and humanistic) mentioned in the Adams People and Products post of Nov 1, 2012, and to the extent that I have a bias, for instance, toward quantitative reasoning and logic (which are good) and away from aesthetics and feelings (which are not only good but powerfully affect people’s judgment of quality), or vice versa, I will do my best to get over it.
Recent Comments